In a world where the Mac Studio exists, who is the M2 Ultra Mac Pro even for?

And will they even buy it anyway?

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Here’s how it works.

OK, I’ll say it.Applescrewed up with the Mac Pro’s super late, super weird transition to Apple silicon. And I can’t be the only one who thinks that way, either.

In fact, I’m starting to think that people inside Apple must know that as well. They must have known it before the world’s press descended onto Apple Park forWWDC 2023where it was announced, because how could they not?

In a world where theMac Studioexists, who’s even buying this thing? And why?

After so long, what happened?

TheMac Prowas the last of Apple’s computers to finally ditchIntel’s ball and chain and go with something a little more its own speed.

TheM2 Ultrais eventually what Apple gave the Mac Pro after years of Intel Xeons beating at its heart and that’s fine. It’s averyfast chip — and easily thefastestthat Apple makes. There was a lot of talk ahead ofWWDC2023 that Apple was working on an M2 Extreme that would effectively be two M2 Ultra’s glued together, but the talk we’ve heard indicates that Apple just couldn’t make it work. Leave that aside for a moment though, because the fact that the Mac Pro has the same chip as the new Mac Studio isn’t the issue here.

That isn’t to say that I wouldn’t have liked to have seen Apple put something new in the Mac Pro. It’s supposed to be the pinnacle of Mac computing and while it still is, you can’t really have two pinnacles and the Mac Studio looms large, especially considering the price point.

For the most part, the Mac Studio is around $3,000 cheaper than a Mac Pro when comparatively specced, with the Mac Studio with M2 Ultra starting at $3,999. The Mac Pro starts at $6,999. So what do you get for that extra money?

Get the best Black Friday deals direct to your inbox, plus news, reviews, and more.

Sign up to be the first to know about unmissable Black Friday deals on top tech, plus get all your favorite TechRadar content.

Space. You get lots and lots of space.

Space, the final frontier

Once upon a time that space was what sold the Mac Pro. That and the globs of performance it offered. But the Mac Studio has that now, so the key differentiator? Space.

Space to add newgraphics cards, space for a ton ofHDDs, and space for moreRAM memoryslots than you knew what to do with. Now, however, that space doesn’t go anywhere near as far as it did in 2019 when the Mac Pro launched.

Sure, there are SATA ports for plugging yourSSDstorage in and there are PCI Express slots — six of them. Specialist video and audio houses will have cards you’ve never heard of just waiting to go into those slots. But do you know what you won’t be putting in there? New GPUs.

That, of course, is because Apple silicon doesn’t support GPUs that aren’t hardwired in as part of those fancy M2 Ultra chips. The same goes for RAM — the new Mac Pro has no RAM slots to speak of because you guessed it. Apple silicon doesn’t support RAM unless it’s onboard.

Now, don’t get me wrong here. I have no problem with Apple’s onboard graphics because it seems to work so long as you don’t want hyper-fast gaming performance. And that onboard RAM is fast. All of that’s fine and dandy…but the Mac Studio has all of that as well.

Which brings me back to my problem. If the Mac Pro is a Mac Studio with space, who is it for? It’s siill thebest Macfor some, but not for many.

The Mac Pro market’s now smaller than ever

There are of course still people, or rather businesses, who will buy the Mac Pro. They used to buy Mac Pros because they were faster than everything else Apple made and had room for their very specific expansion cards. Cards that few people need, but that, for them, makes workflows possible that just can’t be done by a Mac Studio.

Thosepeople will buy the Mac Pro, of course, but how many are there, really? By sliding the Mac Pro market into such a small sliver of its former self, Apple runs the risk of making it the next Xserve — a product that has a place, but is used in such specific cases and by specific businesses that it just isn’t worth keeping around. And when that happens, the Mac Pro’s days are truly numbered.

Am I ringing the death knell of the Mac Pro? No, of course not. Apple already did that with the 2023 Mac Studio.

Oliver Haslam has written about Apple and the wider technology business for more than a decade with bylines on How-To Geek, PC Mag, iDownloadBlog, and many more. He has also been published in print for Macworld, including cover stories. Having grown up using PCs and spending far too much money on graphics card and flashy RAM, Oliver switched to the Mac with a G5 iMac and hasn’t looked back.

A new dawn for Mac gaming? Apple’s M4 Mac mini will support hardware-accelerated ray tracing

MacBook Pro M5 next year might be disappointing as rumor suggests the real fireworks are coming with MacBook Pro M6 with OLED in 2026

Watch out, Nvidia - new benchmarks suggest Apple M4 Ultra could beat the mighty RTX 4090